Johnny Depp and Amber Heard have been embroiled in a protracted legal dispute over defamation for years. The highly scrutinised legal dispute involving defamation between Amber Heard and Johnny Depp, which started in 2019. Has finally come to a close, but not without difficulties.
Here are the main points to take away from Amber Heard’s remarks regarding the resolution of the Johnny Depp defamation case:
According to Amber Heard, she “never decided” to settle.
Amber Heard’s statement began. After much thought, I have decided to settle the defamation case launched against me by my ex-husband in Virginia, notably referring to Johnny Depp as “my ex-husband.” However, Amber adamantly stated that she had no choice in the matter. Particularly after standing by the truth she had stated: “I must emphasise that I never selected this. My life as I knew it was ruined because I stood up for the truth.”
Also read:Things you should know before going on vacation to Mexico City
The American court system has “lost faith” in Amber Heard.
After the Aquaman actress wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post in 2018. Johnny Depp sued Amber Heard for defamation and sought damages of USD 50 million. Despite omitting the 59-year-old actor’s identity. Amber claimed in the op-ed that she became a “public figure representing domestic abuse”. After a contentious defamation trial that the entire world watched in June 2022. The jury found that Heard had violated the law on all three charges of defamation of her ex-husband.
Amber Heard explains why she decided against filing a defamation lawsuit.
Amber Heard envisioned the following scenario if she were to win the defamation appeal: “The greatest result would be a retrial where a fresh jury would have to again weigh the facts, even if my US appeal is successful. I can’t possibly go through that a third time.”
To concentrate on her career, Amber Heard
Amber Heard wants to begin fresh in the midst of “a difficult and expensive legal process: “Time is valuable, and I want to use it wisely and productively. I have been imprisoned in an expensive and time-consuming judicial system for far too long, and it has repeatedly failed to defend my interests or my freedom of speech. I can’t afford to take the chance of incurring an impossible debt—one that is not only materialistic but also psychological, physical, and emotional.